Current:Home > reviewsWhat to know about legal battles on details of abortion rights ballot measures across US -Ascend Wealth Education
What to know about legal battles on details of abortion rights ballot measures across US
View
Date:2025-04-12 00:06:17
Abortion access ballot measures are the center of a new wave of legal and procedural questions across the U.S.
Opponents of abortion access have focused on the technicalities at a time when votes have been siding with abortion access advocates. That side has prevailed on all seven ballot questions in the last two years. Abortion-related measures are on November ballots in six states — and that number could grow.
There have been disputes about how official documents should describe the measures and the details of whether they qualify for the ballots at all.
Here’s what to know about the latest wave of legal questions.
How should Arizona’s measure be described?
In Arizona, election officials are still verifying whether there are enough valid signatures to add a measure protecting abortion rights to the ballot.
Even with that question lingering, there’s a dispute over how to describe the measure in a pamphlet to be provided to voters as a resource.
A Republican-led legislative committee wants it to describe a fetus as an “unborn human being.”
Arizona for Abortion Access this week filed a lawsuit trying to block the use of that phrase, arguing it’s politically charged and chosen to rally opposition to the measure.
Did Arkansas advocates file sufficient paperwork?
Arkansas election officials on Wednesday rejected petitions to put an abortion-rights measure to voters there, sparking a disagreement that hasn’t moved to the courts yet.
The secretary of state’s office said the petitions submitted earlier this month did not include the required statements regarding paid signature gatherers.
The group pushing for the ballot measure, Arkansas for Limited Government, said they did turn in what they were supposed to. But the state maintains its position, and it could be headed to court.
Who can sign Montana petitions?
The organizations behind two Montana ballot measures — including one to ensure abortion rights — this week sued the secretary of state’s office over changes it made to the rules about whose signatures may be accepted to support ballot measures.
Secretary of State Christi Jacobsen told counties last month that they must reject the signatures of voters who are inactive — those who fail to vote in a general election and who have not responded to efforts to confirm their mailing address.
The groups promoting the ballot measures say that position runs afoul of the state constitution, which calls for petitions to be signed by qualified electors — U.S. citizens over 18 who meet registration and residency requirements.
A hearing on the issue is scheduled for Tuesday.
Petitions for amendments to protect abortion rights and to eliminate partisan primary elections were submitted in June.
Are these fights common?
The developments this week are just the latest round of conflicts about abortion ballot questions.
In South Dakota, the Life Defense Fund last month sued to block an abortion rights measure that’s on the November ballot. That case is still pending in court.
Judges’ rulings have been crucial in getting amendments to guarantee abortion rights on the ballot in Florida and Nevada.
The top state court in New York on Thursday agreed with a lower court decision that put an amendment to bar discrimination over “gender identity” and “pregnancy outcomes” before voters. A judge in May took it off the ballot after finding a procedural error by lawmakers who had put it there.
Last year, Ohio voters rejected a requirement that constitutional amendments get 60% of the popular vote just months before approving an amendment to add abortion rights to the state constitution.
The ballot questions are part of a resetting of state abortion policies after a 2022 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that ended the nationwide right to abortion. Most Republican-controlled states have begun enforcing restrictions — including 14 that now have bans on abortion at all stages of pregnancy, with limited exceptions.
veryGood! (9489)
Related
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- One man left Kansas for a lifesaving liver transplant — but the problems run deeper
- Elliot Page Grateful to Be Here and Alive After Transition Journey
- Barbie's Star-Studded Soundtrack Lineup Has Been Revealed—and Yes, It's Fantastic
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- One man left Kansas for a lifesaving liver transplant — but the problems run deeper
- Niall Horan Teasing Details About One Direction’s Group Chat Is Simply Perfect
- California man who attacked police with taser on Jan. 6 sentenced to 12 1/2 years in prison
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- More than 6 in 10 say Biden's mental fitness to be president is a concern, poll finds
Ranking
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- FDA changes rules for donating blood. Some say they're still discriminatory
- Here's what's on the menu for Biden's state dinner with Modi
- A Lesson in Economics: California School District Goes Solar with Storage
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Hunter Biden to appear in court in Delaware in July
- What we know about the tourist sub that disappeared on an expedition to the Titanic
- This telehealth program is a lifeline for New Mexico's pregnant moms. Will it end?
Recommendation
The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
Gov. Rejects Shutdown of Great Lakes Oil Pipeline That’s Losing Its Coating
Duke Energy Takes Aim at the Solar Panels Atop N.C. Church
Teens say social media is stressing them out. Here's how to help them
Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
This Sheet Mask Is Just What You Need to Clear Breakouts and Soothe Irritated, Oily Skin
Sudanese doctors should not have to risk their own lives to save lives
How Federal Giveaways to Big Coal Leave Ranchers and Taxpayers Out in the Cold